User talk:Kepper
In response, I had noticed that the entire page was copied from Jim Whitehead's campaign site which would appear to be a copyright violation, but if you have received pemission to use it from the copyright holder you must make a note of that, along with names and dates: see Wikipedia:Copyrights#Using copyrighted work from others for a more detailed explaination --Tdl1060 17:37, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
The page was not copied! I was sent the same source document from the originator that the webmaster of whiteheadforcongress.com was given. I can send you the e-mail if you like. What do I need to do to re-establish what I had completed yesterday? There is some information in that text that needs to be in there. Kepper 17:53, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
- According to Wikipedia:Copyrights: "If you obtain special permission to use a copyrighted work from the copyright holder under the terms of our license, you must make a note of that fact (along with names and dates)."--Tdl1060 18:15, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
I have obtained written permission via e-mail to use the content mentioned. It has been sent to the OTRS system.
-- Kepper 19:04, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
- please note that gives no assurance whatsoever that any or all the material will remain. "If you don't want your writing to be edited mercilessly or redistributed by others, do not submit it." Others will edit as they see fit. DGG 02:58, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
Your image
[edit]
Wikipedia cannot accept material that is declared to be "non-commercial use only" or "only for use on Wikipedia". Whilst it may seem reasonable to restrict material that way, Wikipedia content is syndicated around the world on the internet and in print, frequently for commercial purposes. Non-commercial or Wikipedia-only content is therefore useless to us. For that reason, such content is marked for speedy deletion automatically and deleted shortly after. For more information, you can visit this page. RΞDVΞRS ✖ ЯΞVΞЯSΞ 20:39, 21 March 2007 (UTC)